wwqgtxx 在 GitHub 的公开发言
我很好奇，为什么你不推动 utls 本身的发展，反而要向一个只是使用其库的下游项目施压。显然，utls 是 Go 生态中非常实用的基础库，但目前没有得到足够的支持。既然你有这么多需求，为什么不直接为 utls 做贡献？ 这种情况与过去的 OpenSSL 十分相似：大量下游项目依赖这个库，却没有任何公司想到要资助它的开发。如果你认为 utls 的开发已经停滞，为什么不联系主要维护者，看看他们是否人手不足？ 我们也对 Xray 团队推出的任何新东西不感兴趣。鉴于他们对其他项目极其敌对的态度，我们不会再浪费时间迁就他们那些古怪的想法，包括但不限于他们打算使用 AI 拼凑出一个所谓的、完全没有经过安全审计的“指纹库”。 归根结底，如果你认为他们的想法和做法是正确的，我们建议你干脆只使用 Xray 作为唯一的软件解决方案。
作者原文@wwqgtxxI am curious why you aren't pushing for the development of utls itself, rather than pressuring a downstream project that merely utilizes its library. Clearly, utls is a highly practical foundational library within the Go ecosystem, yet it lacks sufficient support. Given the volume of requests you have, why not directly contribute to utls?
This situation is strikingly similar to the state of OpenSSL in the past: a vast number of downstream projects relied on the library, yet no company thought to sponsor its development. If you feel that utls development has stalled, why not contact the primary maintainers to see if they are short-staffed?
We also have no interest in whatever new things the Xray team has come up with. Due to their extremely hostile attitude toward other projects, we will no longer waste time accommodating their eccentric ideas—including, but not limited to, their plan to use AI to cobble together a so-called "fingerprint library" that lacks any security auditing.
Ultimately, if you believe their ideas and methods are correct, we suggest you simply use Xray as your sole software solution.